I’ve had the 12-200mm for five days now and shot about 600 shots on my EM5II. I like the ergonomics (handling, size, weight).
The zoom ring has a little bit of resistance and requires a bit more force to get the last bit of the zoom lens out. Zoom and focus rings feel like metal – very nice feel.
I?have been on a learning curve re this lens’s sharpness. Let’s review this.
Is it Sharp?
Having being spoilt by the primes and the excellent 12-40 f2.8 and 40-150 f2.8 zooms, I know the 12-200 isn’t going to match those – and it doesn’t. Wide open at 12mm I reckon it does – super sharp. For the rest of the focal range, you need to stop down, but not too much of course because of diffraction stealing sharpness. My current results are as follows
12mm - f3.5, advice: wide open ok - do not go over f8 26mm - f4.7, advice: stop down to 6 - do not go over f9 50mm - f5.7, advice: stop down to 7 - do not go over f9 100mm - f6.2, advice: stop down to 8 - do not go over f10 150mm - f6.3, advice: stop down to 8 - do not go over f10 200mm - f6.3, advice: stop down to 9 or 10 - do not go over f13
The above is only a rough guide re maximum central sharpness, and its rules can probably be bent slightly. Happy to compare with other numbers people might have – its also a bit hard to remember!
Unless wide open at 12mm, this lens rarely gives me that micro-contrasty 3D feeling of satisfaction that I get with the other Olympus lenses. Yes, yes, I know – that is to be expected for this insane zoom range form factor. I probably would have been happier with the 12-100mm f4 which I don’t own – as I am a bit of proud pixel peeper. Still the results are very good as long as I remember to stop down. If I forget, I can get soft photos. Below is a brick wall shot that I stopped down correctly for – thus its decently sharp.
Sharpness is good, not bitingly excellent, when stopped down. Here are some sample shots, using correct stopping down technique, all unprocessed and exported from Lightroom:
What about 200mm?
Here are a bunch of shots at 200mm, mostly stopped down as specified, all unprocessed and exported from Lightroom.
Interestingly, the rusty tank shot is taken at both f8 vs f11 and looking at it again, I can’t see much if any difference in detail, suggesting you don’t need to stop down to f9 and above for 200mm – and that f8 us sufficient. Though that might be because the rusty tank subject is far away. If the subject is close, then I would still stop down to f9, f10 or even f11 at 200mm.
I haven’t studied the CA and corner sharpness yet so can’t comment on those aspects.
To view all full size originals (as jpeg) then visit the dpreview forum thread where I also have posted these images.
This lens is a very nicely sized, weighted and well built. Sharpness is not ideal, but can be managed by stopping down. I was thinking of sending this lens back but I’ve actually got some good images from it, now that I’ve learned its limitations and how to stop down correctly. And they are images that I would not have otherwise got, say, with a 12-100mm f4 due to the extra reach I now have.
Here is an example of a processed image?(google photos link) that was taken at 112mm over a garden fence, to flowers that I couldn’t reach.
I think it’s going to be a great travel lens – and walkabout lens.
I’m keeping it.
My Software Websites:
Pynsource?- UML for Python
Python to RPN?- Run Python 3 on vintage HP calculators
Print42?- Electron-Python app, non-invasive log file annotation tool that supports thermal printers
My?Software Blog?on UML, Design Patterns, Python and more